Epistemology
Introduction E9F5FC Questions FFFFC0 Software |
Attach:20200331-NewCasesOverTotalCases-Coronavirus-800.png Δ Δ Notes from talk with Shu-Hong:
New Cases / Total Cases - Country - Total Cases
Letter written March 23, 2020 The Coronavirus COVID-19 is an extremely contagious disease, a troublesomely lethal disease, and what is perhaps worst, a surreptitious disease. You can be spreading the disease before you even realize that you have it yourself. There are two ways that countries approach this disease: 1) snuff it out, or 2) try to live with it and "slow it down". China, South Korea, Japan have almost succeeded in taking the first route. That means aggressively shutting down society, closing off cities, isolating people, testing everybody who might possibly have it, and chasing down every person they may have contacted. If you want to see how successful they are, then calculate the New Cases (In the Last Day) and divide by the Total Cases. In South Korea, it is 98 / 8897 = about 1%. Data The US and many European countries have instead taken the "just slow it down" route. The statistics show that it is simply not effective. Here are countries in lockdown (New cases / Total Cases = Daily Growth Rate)
Note that lockdown is not as aggressive as chasing down every single case. So it is too little, too late. Here are countries without lockdown:
Statistics for the US are here, click on "Yesterday"
You can see that it's too little, too late. The US is full of wishful thinking. And surely the US is underreporting and undercounting. Who knows how many mild cases are there in the US? But they are all carriers. But let's accept the current numbers for the US and the current rate. We can project:
Those are the numbers with your current behavior in the US, where it's thinkable to have such get togethers, which nobody in Italy would contemplate. Now suppose that TODAY the US took drastic measures, as in Italy. Well, that would push it down to a 12% rate.
So you push it back a good month. Here in Lithuania we took strict measures BEFORE internal spreading occurred. We had a lower rate than the US, and in fact, we had no internal spreading of the disease. But we shut down our society one week ago, on Monday, March 16. That meant the borders were closed, all schools were closed, all stores were closed (except for food and medicine), all events were prohibited, all government services were stopped (except online), and so on. Even so, the virus is progressing. About 100 people who returned from other countries were found to have the disease and so there have been cases where they spread it to family members. What is worse, the virus has appeared in various hospitals, probably because doctors came back from trips and didn't self-isolate sufficiently. So that means that hundreds of medical staff have to be quarantined. All kinds of mistakes are being made, and there are shortages of testing supplies. But this is the GOOD case. We are dealing with the virus and we have a chance. If the world had worked together to snuff out the virus, then that would have been great. But instead we have hundreds and thousands of clusters throughout the world, spreading the disease. So the virus won't stop until it has gotten billions of people sick. This is not going to end in a couple of months. This will take a couple of years. This is like the 1918 flu pandemic. In our case, what is the death rate? So far 340,000 have contracted the virus. About 15,000 died (4%) , 100,000 recovered (29%), and 225,000 are still sick. Which is to say, for the inactive cases, the death rate is 13%. Now, if mild cases are not being reported, then it could be lower. Also, in Germany, there have been 25,000 cases with 94 deaths so far (0.3%), whereas in Italy there have been 59,000 cases with 5,500 death so far (9%). In the US, there have been 33,000 cases with 420 deaths so far (1.3%). Even a low death rate of 3% means 30 million people out of every billion people. Which is to say, we can expect 100 million people to die because of our behavior. But it could be 500 million people depending on our solidarity. What will happen to the people in Africa or India or South America? This problem has changed our world. We are very vulnerable. Countries like Russia or China or Turkey and many others can take the opportunity to start wars. There will doubtless be a great depression. The good thing is this is an opportunity to remake our world. We see the kind of effort that we should be making to deal with climate change. We see the need for a world that is better organized and better governed, on a planetary level. Here in Lithuania we will likely succeed in transforming our economy to perform in a state of quarantine, making maximum use of the Internet. People will repopulate the villages. The education system will be transformed. But look at how the US is responding. The main goal is to salvage the stock market. Trillions of dollars will be borrowed with the idea that this crisis will end in a couple of months. And what will you do after that? Why are you stimulating your economy, heating it up, rather than letting it shut down, rather than waiting this out? Why are you propping up industries, like the airline industry, rather than saying, hey, this is the time to deal with climate change, and let certain industries shrink? The situation is reminiscent of 9/11. That changed our lives for a couple of years. It also lead to trillions spent on wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. In the end, it didn't amount to much. But it did represent a lost opportunity by the US to do positive things. That money could have been spent on integrating the US and Mexican economies and cultures in a friendly way, much like the EU integrated Eastern Europe successfully, at a cost of a trillion or so. The coronavirus will change our world for a couple of years at least. What will be the longer term upshot? It seems likely that China will advance and the US will recede. It would be nice if the US got its act together. |